
For the past 1.5 years, I've been listening to Red Pill content. For those that are unfamiliar, this is a movement dedicated to shedding light on men's problems in society, though oftentimes the focus is on dating and marriage. I'm old enough to remember learning about the men's rights movement from people like Cassie Jaye and Karen Straughan. These people gave a voice to issues that I noticed in my own life, be they personal or with loved ones. The validation from bigger names was so satisfying, and I appreciated the retort to once new but now tired talking points (e.g. toxic masculinity).
In more recent years, the men's rights movement has taken a backseat as the Internet has been struck with Red Pill content creators, with some of the more prominent ones being Kevin Samuels and Pearl Davis. Certainly there is some overlap between the two spheres, and there are some great points offered up by all parties involved. Unfortunately, the way the theories manifest in the real world are completely different, and they tend to result in quite a bit of tension between the sexes.
Case in point: an X user by the name of @littleapostate posted a couple of pictures. One of them showcases her a bit older, and the other appears to show her when she was in college (or at least around that age).
In one photo I am in my prime, in the other I have hit the wall
— littleapostate (@littleapostate) March 22, 2024
wish I could go back pic.twitter.com/s1rNjHpObY
She appears more feminine, graceful, and mature in the photo on the left. However, Red Pill philosophy suggests that women are more valuable when they are younger and lose value as they age. I originally heard this argument through the lens of "sexual marketplace value," or how much one's sex appeal is valued. From this standpoint, it makes sense that 18-25ish is the peak of one's life. As we age, body parts won't be as firm and/or supple as they once were. Hence, if someone says that they are in their prime and they are older than 25ish, then they are delusional. Red Pill would likely say that they are in denial of "hitting The Wall," which means they are at a point in life where prospects for dating and marriage have dried up considerably. This person isn't as desirable physically, mentally, emotionally, and spiritually. Though I've seen various ages for when one hits The Wall, the most common age I've seen is 35.
However, Red Pill tends to focus heavily on "owning delusional women," so there is a large focus on women's roles in relationships. If a woman is 35 and complaining there are no good men left, the assumptions about her are numerous: she likely has a drug problem, she was probably "ran through" when she was younger, she is difficult, she is self-absorbed, she blew lots of good opportunities with great men and wasted her youth, etc. It's certainly possible that these things are true about this hypothetical woman, AND it's also true that the assumptions may be wildly inaccurate. That doesn't matter though, as many responses to divergent opinions tend to be ad hominem attacks. "You're just trying to cope with your bad decisions. Stop using copium. You need to accept that you aren't as valuable now as you once were." Though I'm making those quotes up, they contain the essence of many responses I've seen from the Red Pill community.
Enter Pearl. She saw the photos from @littleapostate and missed the obvious sarcasm taking aim at Red Pill philosophy.
Cope cope cope https://t.co/RCLvTxJf96
— H. Pearl Davis (@pearlythingz) March 23, 2024
I responded to this, and I'll post a few of the ongoing responses:


Though these are only two examples, anyone scrolling through the comments will see lots of these responses. How is this helping any dialogue between the sexes? How is this bringing people closer together? If anything, this divisive rhetoric is making dating worse.
Here is the truth: people have long and winding life paths. Not everyone is going to meet someone to marry in high school or college. Whether you agree with it or not, America is much looser with dating and sex than other parts of the world. Some people still choose to date with intentionality, and others prefer casual hookups. The former will bring more long-term satisfaction, AND sometimes people mistake the latter for the better life path. Though I don't encourage it, I still understand it.
Red Pill doesn't seem to understand and has no room for grace. People grow and change, and they become wiser and more capable as they go through life. It's okay to make mistakes in love and dating. That doesn't mean you are out of the dating or marriage pools. However, that idea is so pervasive that it's hard for others to speak up about it.
Case in point:
This man puts it perfectly. There is no way to sound persuasive when the responses all entail "StOp CoPiNg BrO." Men and women reach their peaks at different times, and even within the sexes, there will be variability.
I met my now wife when we were both 31. If I was following Red Pill philosophy, I should've been spending my time getting more money, spending more time in the gym, and going for a woman in her early 20s. I don't know much about today's early 20s women, but if they are anything like the early 20s women I came up with, they would be grossed out by dating someone around 10 years their senior. Of course there will always be exceptions ("Hey baby, I'm a billionaire at 31, want to date me?"), but for the most part, that's not how the real world works. If I took the Red Pill, I still might've tried to force the square peg into the round hole, and I would've missed out on the last 4 wonderful years (with many more to come).
So if you are wondering about Red Pill ideas and if you should buy into them completely, just know that you don't have to do so. If you find someone later in life, that's okay. If you regret certain decisions you made in your 20s, that's okay. Date with intentionality, and find someone who will understand and accept you despite those mistakes. I promise she is worth the wait.